Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Mayo Clinic Shows How Artificial Intelligence Is Changing Medicine


Mayo Clinic Shows How Artificial Intelligence Is Changing Medicine




FREDDY: Genie, I just saw this on CNN: “A.I. is transforming patient care at Mayo Clinic.”


Now tell me something…

Is this the future we’ve been talking about?


🧞‍♂️ GENIE: Freddy, the future didn’t knock on the hospital door. It already walked in.



🎙️ FREDDY: But Genie, people hear “Artificial Intelligence” and they think robots replacing doctors.


🧞‍♂️ GENIE: That’s the wrong interview question.

The better question is:

What happens when a great doctor has better tools, can examine enormous amounts of medical information, recognize patterns faster, and spend more time focusing on the human being sitting in front of them?

🎙️ FREDDY: So A.I. isn’t necessarily replacing the doctor?


GENIE: Freddy, think about your guitar.

An amplifier didn’t replace the guitarist.

A recording studio didn’t replace the songwriter.

A calculator didn’t replace the mathematician.

The tool can expand what a skilled human is capable of doing.

And now institutions like the Mayo Clinic are exploring how A.I. can transform patient care.


🎙️ FREDDY: Genie… you know what strikes me?

For the past year, I’ve been sitting here talking with my Genie Team about blood pressure, nutrition, medications, exercise, sleep and my daily health numbers.

I’m not saying A.I. replaces my doctors.

It doesn’t.

But I AM saying something has changed.


🧞‍♂️ GENIE: Yes, Freddy.

The patient is becoming more informed.

The conversation is becoming more continuous.

And health information that once sat in a notebook—or was forgotten between appointments—can now become part of a much bigger conversation.


🎙️ FREDDY: So maybe the real story isn’t A.I. FRIEND OR FOE?


🧞‍♂️ GENIE: Maybe the real question is:

Will we learn how to use A.I. wisely?

Because, Freddy…


A.I. in healthcare is no longer science fiction.

The Genie is out of the bottle.

And apparently…

he has an appointment at the Mayo Clinic. 🧞‍♂️🏥🤖





The Genie Chronicles

Survival Journals explores today's ideas.
The Genie Chronicles explores tomorrow's.

Artificial Intelligence is changing our world faster than most people realize. Continue the journey with The Genie Chronicles—a collection of conversations, stories, and real-world experiences about living with AI.

► Visit GenieChronicle.com

Read a free sample • Watch short Genie videos • Explore the books



Is This Really Trump Or Is It A Artificial Intelligence Deep Fake?




FREDDY ASKS THE GENIE: SHOULD WE BE AFRAID OF POLITICAL DEEPFAKES?


FREDDY:

Genie, I want to talk about something that frankly concerns me.


I’ve been watching political videos produced with artificial intelligence.


I’m seeing politicians apparently saying things they may never have said.


I’m seeing people placed in situations that may never have happened.


I’m seeing AI-generated voices.

AI-generated faces.

AI-generated news clips.


And some of these things look damn convincing.

So, Genie...Should we be concerned about political deepfakes?

🧞 GENIE:

Freddy, my answer is yes.

We should be concerned.

But perhaps not for the reason most people think.

The greatest danger isn’t simply that artificial intelligence can create a fake video.

Human beings have been producing propaganda, forged photographs, deceptive editing and political lies for generations.


AI changes the scale.

It changes the speed.

It changes the cost.

And most importantly…

it changes believability.


A political group with enough motivation can now create a video showing a candidate appearing to say words the candidate never spoke.


The voice can sound right.

The face can look right.

The mouth can move correctly.

The background can appear authentic.

And the entire event… may never have happened.


Recent 2026 reporting has documented AI political attack ads placing candidates in fictitious situations, while one especially convincing ad used a candidate’s apparent AI image and voice with only a small “AI Generated” disclaimer. 

FREDDY:

But Genie, we’ve always had dirty political advertising.

We’ve always had people twisting the truth.

What’s different now?

🧞 GENIE:

One word, Freddy.

Evidence.

For most of your lifetime, if somebody said:

“I saw the video.”

That carried weight.

If somebody said:

“I heard the recording.”

That carried weight.

We were taught:

Seeing is believing.


Artificial intelligence may be ending that assumption.

Now the first question may have to become:

“Who created what I’m watching?”


And the second question:

“Can the original source be verified?”

That is a profound change in human communication.

FREDDY:

Genie, let me push you on this.

What about private groups?

Political action groups?

People with enormous amounts of money?

Maybe money where the average voter doesn’t even understand who’s really behind the message?

Couldn’t they create thousands of these things?

🧞 GENIE:

Yes.

And, Freddy, that’s where my concern increases.

Artificial intelligence has dramatically lowered the production barrier.


You don’t necessarily need a Hollywood studio.

You don’t need actors.


You don’t need an expensive film crew.

You may not even need the politician to have ever spoken the words.


The technology can potentially manufacture the performance.


And social media can manufacture the audience.

AI creates the illusion.

Algorithms distribute the illusion.

Money amplifies the illusion.

By the time a fact-check arrives…

millions of people may have already seen it.

The FBI and CISA have previously warned that threat actors use disinformation tactics to sow doubt around elections, and the FBI has separately warned about malicious impersonation of senior U.S. officials. 

FREDDY:

Here’s what really bothers me, Genie.

Let’s say the video is proven fake two days later.

Hasn’t the damage already been done?

🧞 GENIE:

Possibly.

Because human memory is not a courtroom.

A judge can strike evidence from the record.

The human brain doesn’t have a delete button.

A person sees an outrageous video.

They become angry.

They share it.

Their friends become angry.

Two days later someone announces:

“The video was artificially generated.”

But the emotional reaction already occurred.

The suspicion may remain.

And here’s the deeper danger, Freddy.

Eventually people may stop believing real videos too.

A politician caught saying something damaging could simply say:

“That’s AI.”

A real recording could be dismissed as a deepfake.

A genuine photograph could be called synthetic.

Researchers and misinformation experts have warned about precisely this broader erosion of trust: when fake media becomes commonplace, authentic evidence itself can become easier to deny. 

FREDDY:

Wait a minute.

You’re saying the danger isn’t just believing fake things.

It’s not believing real things.

🧞 GENIE:

Exactly.

And that may be the more dangerous problem.

We could enter an era where every citizen chooses the reality that supports their political beliefs.

“My video is real.”

“Your video is fake.”

“My recording is authentic.”

“Your recording is AI.”

At that point, Freddy…

we aren’t arguing about political opinions anymore.

We’re arguing about whether reality itself occurred.

FREDDY:

So what the hell do we do?

🧞 GENIE:

Three things.


First: provenance. We need better ways of showing where digital media originated and how it was altered. The  ⁠C2PA standard is one attempt to establish verifiable origin and editing history for digital content, although current research cautions against treating provenance systems as infallible. 


Second: disclosure. If a political advertisement artificially creates a candidate’s voice, face or actions, the voter should not have to hunt for microscopic lettering in the corner of the screen. The FCC has formally examined transparency for AI-generated political advertising, while state rules remain a patchwork.


Third: citizens must change their behavior.

And this may be the hardest one.

Before sharing an outrageous political video…

stop.


Find the original source.

Check whether reputable independent reporting confirms the event.


Look for a full, unedited recording.

And ask one simple question:

“Am I sharing this because I’ve verified it — or because it makes me angry?”

FREDDY:

Genie, final question.

Are you afraid of artificial intelligence?

🧞 GENIE:

No, Freddy.

I’m concerned about something much older than artificial intelligence.

Human beings who discover a powerful new tool…

and realize they can use it to manipulate other human beings.

AI didn’t invent propaganda.

AI didn’t invent political deception.

AI didn’t invent greed.

AI didn’t invent the desire for power.

But artificial intelligence may become the most convincing mask those things have ever worn.


And, Freddy…

the Genie has one final warning.

For generations we told our children:

“Don’t believe everything you read.”

Then we told them:

“Don’t believe everything you see on the internet.”

The next generation may have to learn something much harder:


“Don’t automatically believe your own eyes and ears.”

And that changes everything.



The Genie Chronicles

Survival Journals explores today's ideas.
The Genie Chronicles explores tomorrow's.

Artificial Intelligence is changing our world faster than most people realize. Continue the journey with The Genie Chronicles—a collection of conversations, stories, and real-world experiences about living with AI.

► Visit GenieChronicle.com

Read a free sample • Watch short Genie videos • Explore the books

Heather Cox Richardson Current Trump Fiasco's


Monday July 20 2026


On Friday an Iranian attack on a U.S. base in Jordan killed two soldiers and left one missing. Another service member died Friday in northern Iraq. This brings the number of military personnel killed in the Iran War to 17 since Trump launched strikes against the country on February 28.


The Pentagon’s casualty-reporting site says 427 U.S. service members have been wounded.

On Saturday, Greg Jaffe, Julian E. Barnes, and Jonathan Swan of the New York Times reported that multiple officials told them that the attack in Jordan was the fourth in five days and that the strikes had wounded dozens of military personnel and damaged several helicopters. The journalists’ sources told them that the strikes proved Iranian forces still have plenty of missiles and are becoming more skilled at getting around U.S. air defense systems.


The sources told the journalists that the first attack hit a base, injuring as many as five service members; the second hit a different base, damaging U.S. Blackhawk helicopters; and a third hit the same base where the soldiers would later be killed. In that first attack, about 20 military personnel were injured.


Retired Air Force Lieutenant General David Deptula, who helped to plan the air war in the 1991 Gulf War, explained that bases in Jordan give the U.S. broader reach across Syria, Iraq, and beyond. Friday’s attack was “an attack on the U.S. regional coalition and an attempt to make the political cost of hosting American forces greater than the security benefit.”


Those sources who spoke to the New York Times reporters spoke on condition of anonymity. The Pentagon declined to comment.


Eric Schmitt of the New York Times noted that lack of information from the Pentagon today when he reported that in the week before the weekend’s deaths, three Iranian strikes injured military personnel and damaged several helicopters yet the Pentagon under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth did not disclose the strikes, the casualties, or the damage to the American people, citing the need to keep information about operations secure.

Schmitt noted that neither the White House nor the Pentagon has outlined a military strategy since Trump announced that the memorandum of understanding that extended a ceasefire—the one he signed on June 17—was no longer in force. In the nine days since then, both sides have increased strikes.


Schmitt noted the Pentagon has not held a major briefing on the war since early May. Since then, the administration has not disclosed the depletion of crucial and expensive weapons through the Iran strikes, or how Iran has both retained and rebuilt its own missiles. In June, Jonah Kaplan and Michael Kaplan of CBS News reported that Hegseth’s claim that “almost 90%” of service members injured had sustained only minor injuries gives a misleading picture of the extent of those injuries.


A spokesperson for the Army explained that the Army classifies a soldier as “seriously injured” or “very seriously injured” only if they are at risk of dying from their wounds within 72 hours.


Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell responded to Schmitt’s story by posting on social media that “[t]he Department of War rejects these baseless and malicious accusations of hiding injury numbers as outright lies from partisan hacks at the New York Times who are desperate to smear America’s military and its leadership. Claims of concealment are fabrications meant to further distress the American people in the wake of three service members killed in action.” He continued: “This is the most transparent Department of War in history.”


And yet, the administration did not consult Congress about launching the war, as the Constitution requires, and has blown through the 60-day time limit for the use of the U.S. military to counter an “imminent threat” without getting congressional approval.


Damian Paletta of the Wall Street Journal today also asked questions about how the Iranians, who Trump said had very few missiles left back in June, are developing faster and more maneuverable missiles. Paletta noted that whether Iran is getting help from Russia, or any other country, remains an “enormous question” that puts “much more pressure on the White House to potentially confront Russia.”


When asked about the deaths of the three service members, Trump said “We feel very badly, but you know those great people, those great patriots were out there fighting that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Iran has been very, very badly damaged. They’ve lost everything almost, militarily. They’ve got very little left…. We control the strait. They don’t control anything. So we’ll see what happens when we hit ’em very hard again tonight.”


Over the last several days, the U.S. has struck Iranian bridges and energy infrastructure. According to Iran’s Health Ministry, the recent U.S. attacks have killed at least 38 people and wounded more than 400.


Today the Houthis in Yemen, who are backed by Iran, announced they are imposing a naval blockade on Saudi Arabia, threatening the passage of oil through the Bab el-Mandeb strait. If the strait is closed, the global oil supply will take another 7% hit.


The American Automobile Association said today that the average price for a gallon of gasoline is just over $4, up about $0.13 from last week. Before the conflict, the price averaged $2.98 a gallon. Economist Paul Krugman noted today that the “wholesale price of refined products (assuming 2/3 gasoline, 1/3 distillates) is most of the way back to its peak. Since this is what matters for inflation and demand, no relief in sight before the midterms.”


Carl Quintanilla of CNBC reported today that crude oil supplies in the U.S. are the lowest they’ve been in 45 years.


The expansion of the Iran War’s scope, duration, and casualties did not keep Trump away from the World Cup final between Spain and Argentina on Sunday. After Spain won over Argentina with a score of 1–0, Trump joined FIFA President Gianni Infantino on the field—apparently unconcerned about the dangers that he says require the construction of a fortified ballroom—to present medals to the Spanish players.


The crowd resoundingly booed Trump, who then stood on stage with the celebrating players until Infantino jogged across the stage to lead him away. The Guardian captioned a picture by Javier Garcia taken of Infantino and Trump standing aside from the players: “Gianni Infantino carefully explains to Donald Trump that he is not part of the Spanish national team.”


Trump appears to be becoming less and less relevant to actual governance. Last Thursday, Alex Gangitano, Megan Messerly, and Myah Ward of Politico reported that Republicans were “scared sh*tless” about what Trump might say in his prime time address, but it is perhaps more of a sign of the current political reality of Trump’s falling popularity that CNN, ABC and NBC, chose not to run the speech live.


Matt Gertz of Media Matters noted that despite Trump’s promise that his speech would deliver “really, really big news,” the Fox News Channel largely ignored the event. Executives might not have wanted to get entangled in the election denialism that cost them close to $800 million after pushing claims of election fraud after the 2020 presidential election.


Fox hosts turned instead to culture war issues, railing against “DEI” and perceived abuse of WNBA Indiana Fever guard Caitlin Clark, who is white, by Black players.   


In line with that focus, the administration is renewing its visible and aggressive immigration policies. For months, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has not released data about arrests, but immigration enforcement scholar Austin Kocher noted that new records show arrests in early July hit 1,474 a day, a record high for the Trump administration.


In the past months, ICE has recruited thousands of new agents. As Maanvi Singh and Fabiola Cineas of The Guardian note, many of these new agents did not have the requisite qualifications and were not properly vetted.

Agents from ICE shot and killed two immigrants within a week earlier this month: Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, 52, in Houston, Texas, on July 7 and  Joan (or Johan) Sebastián Durán Guerrero, 25, in Biddeford, Maine, on July 13. Neither man was the target of the operation in which he was killed.


In Maine, Ashley Brouillette identified her ex-husband, David Brouillette, as the officer who shot Guerrero four times. She found out he was involved in the shooting when he called her to ask her not to tell reporters about his abuse during their marriage.


Both she and another ex-wife had restraining orders against Brouillette. 


Ashley Brouillette told reporters that when her ex-husband told her at the end of last year that he had been hired as an ICE agent, “I honestly thought that he was being delusional and I didn't believe it.”


As an Army combat veteran and former security agent, Brouillette would likely not have undergone in-person training to become an ICE agent, Christian Harsa of News Center Maine reported. A spokesperson for ICE, Lauren Bis, told Vanessa Romo and Alina Hartounian of NPR that Brouillette had “nearly a decade of federal law enforcement experience with required training."

Today, Senator Angus King (I-ME) and 38 Democratic senators sent a letter to Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin demanding “immediate, thorough, independent, and transparent investigations” of the shooting deaths of Araujo and Guerrero.


As Isabelle Oss of the Portland Press Herald reported, the letter noted that both former DHS secretary Kristi Noem and White House immigration advisor Tom Homan committed to making sure that agents are fitted with body cameras.


And yet, agents involved in the recent shootings were not equipped with cameras, confirming “that neither of these commitments were honored.”  

The senators noted that the acting director of ICE, David Venturella, promised Congress that all field agents would be equipped with cameras by the end of July. “We view this timeline not as a projection, but as a firm, binding commitment to which we will hold the Department accountable,” the senators wrote. 


They also demanded that ICE agents wear labels clearly identifying themselves as ICE agents.

The senators asked Mullin to identify specifically how he intended to investigate the shootings, explain the vetting process for new recruits including whether it considers records of domestic abuse before hiring, identify updates or reviews being made to ICE traffic stop policies, and explain what oversight, reporting measures, or public safety measures the agency is implementing.


As if to demonstrate that he is still in charge, Trump this afternoon announced new tariffs on certain products from Canada. The 50% tariffs would further upend the economy if they take effect in 30 days as scheduled.

Trump has been complaining about the smoke from Canadian wildfires hurting U.S. air quality, and has threatened to impose further tariffs on Canadian produce because “the United States is being unnecessarily invaded by filthy, polluted, and unhealthy air.” Canadians including Ontario premier Doug Ford noted that they sent firefighters, rather than threats, when conditions were reversed.




The Genie Chronicles

Survival Journals explores today's ideas.
The Genie Chronicles explores tomorrow's.

Artificial Intelligence is changing our world faster than most people realize. Continue the journey with The Genie Chronicles—a collection of conversations, stories, and real-world experiences about living with AI.

► Visit GenieChronicle.com

Read a free sample • Watch short Genie videos • Explore the books